Hitchcock's Films Revisited PDF/EPUB ✓ Hitchcock's

Hitchcock's Films Revisited When Hitchcock s Films was first published, it quickly became known as a new kind of book on film and a necessary text in the growing body of Hitchcock criticism When Robin Wood returned to his writings in Hitchcock s films and published Hitchcock s Films Revisited in , the multidimensional essays took on a new shape one tempered by Wood s own development as a criticThis revised edition of Hitchcock s Films Revisited includes a substantial new preface in which Wood reveals his personal history as a film scholar including his coming out as a gay man, his views on his previows critical work, and how his writings, his love of film, and his personal life have remained deeply intertwined through the years This revised edition includes all eighteen original essays and a new chapter on Marnie titled You Freud, Me Hitchcock Does Mark Cure Marnie

About the Author: Robin Wood

Robert Paul Wood, known as Robin Wood, was an English film critic and educator who lived in Canada for much of his life He wrote books on the works of Alfred Hitchcock, Howard Hawks, Satyajit Ray, Ingmar Bergman, Michelangelo Antonioni, and Arthur Penn Wood was a longtime member and co founder, along with other colleagues at Toronto s York University of the editorial collective which publishes CineACTION , a film theory magazine Wood was also York professor emeritus of film 2 Robin Wood was a founding editor of CineAction and author of numerous influential works, including new editions published by Wayne State University Press of Personal Views Explorations in Film 2006 , Howard Hawks 2006 , Ingmar Bergman 2013 , Arthur Penn 2014 and The Apu Trilogy 2016 He was professor emeritus at York University, Toronto, and the recipient of a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Society for Cinema and Media Studies.

10 thoughts on “Hitchcock's Films Revisited

  1. says:

    Robin was one of my dearest friends I want to leave it at that He s a visionary pioneer in terms of film analysis, and loved red wine as much as myself I miss him If you respect Hitchcock AND gender, READ THIS.

  2. says:

    This is a brilliant look at Hitchcock s films Wood in this version looks back on his original text and reworks them whilst adding new content I found the new introduction and discussion about F.R Leavis particularly enlightening Even though this may be a little dated in some ways Wood comments on this himself it is still a thought provoking text.

  3. says:

    Really monumental, and can be read as a history of approaches to film studies as much as a work of film studies The stuff on identification is particularly interesting and subtle Also, it s odd to see someone so confidently trotting out psychoanalytic theory although with that confidence comes clarity maybe the obscurity of a lot of modern psychoanalytic theory is du

  4. says:

    Required reading back in university, and wasn t I a lucky youngling to discover this updated volume, battered but still holding together, in an Oxfam for dirt cheap Seriously though my god, the expense of your textbooks in those days Ruinous, it was But some brilliant work was found on those reading lists, and I would recommend Robin Wood s volume as one of the best available

  5. says:

    Un livre r ellement int ressant.

  6. says:

    Really helped me with my Hitchcock class on the films he analyzes Not all films were covered, but the ones that were, great insight

  7. says:

    This is one of the must have books for any serious student of Hitchcock It will make you see his films in new ways The author had his own interesting journey from the time of his original book in the 60s to this revision from 1989, and that s reflected as well Personalities aside, reading Wood s agonizing reappraisal of Marnie is worth it for the aficionados Wood had championed the film as a neglected

  8. says:

    Though not as enjoyable to read as A Hitchcock Reader, the other textbook I used for this class, I greatly enjoyed reading this book, as well I think I prefer anthologies in general, as there are different voices to be heard, rather than only one This book also addressed many topics within films that I was interested in, though this is unique in that it analyzes films in general for the first part of the book,

  9. says:

    A simply masterful work of criticism, and I say that as someone who findsthan a few of Wood s conclusions a stretch I still don t know if I can look at Hitchcock s work as such a progressive oeuvre, but Wood made me wrack my brain over the shots and scenarios he mentioned to see if I could refute them I never could It s also a highly readable distillation of some of the various critical theories to come out of the post

  10. says:

    Perhaps still the foremost critic on Hitchcock s films, this is an update of Wood s landmark 1965 book that changed the director s reputation in the English speaking world No one else I ve read has captured so well what is greatest in Hitchcock s films while pointing out their occasional weaknesses The book is also a portrait of Wood s own evolution from callow wanna be and closeted gay man to fierce and uncompromising Marxist F

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top